A Little Birther Batshit Insanity on Donald Trump

 From Newsmax:

Donald Trump, who has been making television appearances calling for  President Barack Obama to release his official birth documents, released  his hospital birth certificate exclusively to Newsmax on Monday.

Why would I post something here from Newsmax, the batshit insane media source, you ask?  Very simple, folks.  To show everybody here how batshit insane Donald Trump is:

1)  First of all, Trump has questioned Obama's birth certificate, calling it a fake, because there is no signature on it.  Guess what?  A few days ago, I pulled out my own birth certificate, and there is no signature on that one either, but it's the one Michigan gave me, when I requested a copy.  No problem.  But don't mind me.  I'm just your friendly neighborhood Kenyan peckerwood.  LOL.

2)  But here is why I posted the Newsmax link - To make fun of Newsmax AND Donald Trump.  Why go after one nut, when I can have twice the fun going after two nuts?  Logic 101, folks.

3) Are you ready for the fun to begin?  Drum roll, please.....

Thank you.

The birth certificate that Donald Trump provided to Newsmax is not an official New York State birth certificate. 

So I must question whether Donald Trump is really an American citizen, or whether, like me, he is also a Kenyan peckerwood.

4) An update to the link I provided shows that Trump, on his second attempt, did provide a real birth certificate, just like Obama did. 

5) Back to Obama.  His birth certificate was certified as real by a Republican governor, Linda Lingle.  Damn it.  I want Trump's certificate certified by the Governor of New York.

6) Donald Trump's birth certificate is not the long version.  Yea, yea, I'm rubbing that one in the birther's faces. 

7)  According to my link, Donald Trump has a plane registered in the Bahamas.  Was there a conspiracy to fly him to New York when he was born, so he could get a birth certificate illegally?  The world wants to know.

8)  Trump's mother was born in Scotland.  Egad!! Don't you know that, according to many "birther" experts, for someone to be a "natural born" citizen, BOTH parents have to be American citizens?

9)  If Obama is not qualified to be President of the United States, then neither is Donald Trump.

10) I am now looking to start a new group, and would like to see how many others would be interested.  The group will be known as the Donald Trump Birther Society.  The purpose of this group will be to question the eligibility of Donald Trump to be President of the United States.  I have contacted the infamous Obama birther attorney, Orly Taitz, to see if she would be interested in representing this new group in court, but I have bad news.  She turned me down.  She doesn't do character assassinations on white people.

Anti-Sharia Law in Oklahoma

OKLAHOMA CITY -- Last year Oklahoma voters passed a State Question that  blocked any use of Islamic or Sharia law in Oklahoma courts. State  Question 755 was ruled unconstitutional and unnecessary by the US  District Court.But now a new effort to prevent state courts in Oklahoma from using  foreign law is underway and this time, an effort is forming to fight it.

Muslims in Oklahoma are pissed, and are going to fight the law.  But that doesn't matter.  The bill, as proposed in Oklahoma is blatantly unconstitutional.   Let me explain:

1)  The wording of the bill, in it's present form, would exclude ALL religious law from being followed.  That means Jewish, Catholic, and Protestant too.  Many, many contracts are made which some of the terms are guided by religious law.  All these contracts would become null and void, which means that the First Amendment rights of people of ALL religions would be violated, per the establishment clause.

2)  OK, so remove the provisions that apply to all religions, other than Islam, and the law apply to Islam only.  Cool?  Nope.  That isn't cool either, as this would be favor the establishment of some religions over others, which also violates the First Amendment.

3)  But, if we allow Sharia law, wouldn't Muslims begin stoning to death adulterers, and those who speak out against Islam?  Of course not.  There are already laws against that.  Let me add that Jews practice Jewish law extensively, and you don't see Jews holding public executions of people who violate God's law, do you?  Of course not.

This is why the bill moving through Oklahoma is nothing but a bugagoo, based on nothing but fear tactics.  Reasonable people can allow the laws of the various religions to have an impact on the daily lives of those who follow those religions, just as long as it is Constitutional.  That, my friends, is the key to the whole thing.  As Thomas Jefferson once said:

Where the preamble declares, that coercion is a departure   from the plan of the holy author of our religion, an amendment   was proposed by inserting "Jesus Christ," so that it   would read "A departure from the plan of Jesus Christ, the   holy author of our religion;" the insertion was rejected   by the great majority, in proof that they meant to comprehend,   within the mantle of its protection, the Jew and the Gentile,   the Christian and Mohammedan, the Hindoo and Infidel of every   denomination. 

In the spirit of Jefferson, let us all pray that the people in Oklahoma put down their pitch forks.

About wars, and those who support or don't support them

From one side, I heard some people at a political forum that I am a member of  bash Bush over Iraq, but give Obama a free pass on Libya. On the other hand, I hear many bash Obama over Libya, although they heavily supported Bush in Iraq. Both are wrong, and I want to address the why in this post. I intend to be hard on party hacks, whether Liberal or Conservative. Why? Because they all deserve it, no matter which party they are hacking for. I am going to start by responding to someone attacking Liberals in general, in a thread I read about Obama's war in Libya, and then equally apply the argument to those who attack Conservatives. What I am posting here is not rocket science, but simple logic. Let me begin.

I am not so sure that all Liberals are supporting Obama, although they bashed Bush, as stated by someone in another thread at the forum. One of the biggest Bush bashers anywhere, Cindy Sheehan, is using irony to blast the crap out of Obama. And guess what, her column actually makes sense, even if I don't agree with all the reasons she gives.

Read Sheehan's column before continuing.

Here's the thing about war - Protesters aren't necessarily Liberals, and Liberals don't always side with the president, regardless of political party. The same can be said about Conservatives. Remember the web site antiwar.com? It is a site that was started by Conservatives and Libertarians, who were really pissed at Bill Clinton getting involved in the Balkans. And what about the web site Americans Against World Empire? How about the web site Conservatives for Peace? A member from that organization wrote this article, which was published on World Net Daily. All Conservatives. So the left doesn't hold a monopoly on being against war.

The point I am making is that there are hypocrites on both the right and the left, who do give a damn about which party is in power before making a decision to bash the president over war policy. And there are those, on both the right and the left, who are honest, either in support of wars or against them. Just lumping everybody into categories, such as Liberal and Conservative, and using those labels to categorize all into just those 2 categories, actually misrepresents political leans. There is no "one size fits all" for either Liberals or Conservatives, unless one just hates either Liberals or Conservatives for the sake of hating Liberals or Conservatives. Unfortunately, there are way too many people who hate first and ask questions later. Such is what American politics has descended into.

Some Liberals, such as Cindy Sheehan, I actually have respect for, because their views don't change when a Democrat becomes president, and there are plenty of Liberals, like Sheehan, who are bashing Obama as hard as they bashed Bush. Of course there are also Liberals who only bash the other party, while giving their own politicians a free pass on the same things. Those are the Liberals I have no respect for.

And the same applies to Conservatives. There are some who are on Obama's side, as they were on Bush's side for doing the same. Although I strongly disagree with them, I do respect them because they are consistent, and not party hacks. To those conservatives who are bashing Obama over Libya, who also bashed Bush over Iraq, they not only have my respect, but also my support, as I believe like they do. The US has no business in Libya, and I can say it with a straight face. I didn't support Bush's war in Iraq (although I did support Afghanistan), and I'll be damned if I support Obama's war in Libya either.

To all those Liberals and Conservatives, who believe that war only matters if the other party is in power, and you guys all know who you are, I have a very short message for you.....

Take a hike.